mobile
mobile mobile

Website Analysis

img Rnaseq.uoregon.edu

Last Analyzed : 02.08.2020
Rnaseq.uoregon.edu recives any estimated n/a unique visitors and n/a unique page views per day. Revenue gained from these much visits may be n/a per day from various advertising sources. The estimated worth of site is n/a.
  • Website Age n/a
  • Alexa Rank no-data
  • Country imgUnited States
  • IP Address 184.171.105.148
META INFORMATION icon
Title
RNA-seqlopedia
Description
-
Keywords
-
Content Type
utf-8
No Meta Name Value
1 viewport width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0
GENERAL HTML INFORMATION icon
Type Status
HTML 5 img
Responsive Website img
HTML SIZE INFORMATION icon
Text / Code Ratio 46.95 %
rnaseq.uoregon.edu has a website text/code ratio of 46.95 %. Search engine crawlers tend to not pick up pages with inadequate content.
IMPORTANT HTML TAGS AND COUNTS icon
Titles icon
  • H11
  • H20
  • H38
  • H437
  • H565
  • H68
H1
No Text
1 Rna-seqlopedia
H3
No Text
1 Rna-seqlopedia
2 0. rna-seq workflow copy this link to clipboard
3 1. experimental design copy this link to clipboard
4 2. rna preparation copy this link to clipboard
5 3. library preparation copy this link to clipboard
6 4. sequencing copy this link to clipboard
7 5. analysis copy this link to clipboard
8 6. references copy this link to clipboard
H4
No Text
1 Writing
2 Editing
3 ımplementation
4 ınquiries
5 1.1 overview copy this link to clipboard
6 1.2 ıdentify the primary experimental objective. copy this link to clipboard
7 1.3 annotation copy this link to clipboard
8 1.4 differential gene expression (dge) copy this link to clipboard
9 1.5 no subst**ute for "pilot" data copy this link to clipboard
10 2.1 overview copy this link to clipboard
H5
No Text
1 Figure 0.1 rna-seq workflow
2 Table 1.1 recommendations for rna-seq options based upon experimental objectives.
3 1.4.1 replication and dge copy this link to clipboard
4 1.4.2 technical vs. biological replication copy this link to clipboard
5 1.4.3 how many replicates should be sequenced? copy this link to clipboard
6 1.4.4 depth of sequencing copy this link to clipboard
7 Figure 1.1
8 1.4.5 experimental complexity copy this link to clipboard
9 Figure 1.2
10 1.4.6 target transcript properties copy this link to clipboard
H6
No Text
1 2.4.3.1 organic extraction copy this link to clipboard
2 2.4.3.2 solid-phase extraction copy this link to clipboard
3 2.4.4.1 a***essing rna quality copy this link to clipboard
4 2.4.4.2 a***essing rna quant**y copy this link to clipboard
5 2.5.1.1 fis***ng out mature mrna by the tail copy this link to clipboard
6 2.5.1.2 supersage enrichment for 3′ mrna tags copy this link to clipboard
7 5.3.1.1 commonly used graph-based a***embly software copy this link to clipboard
8 5.3.2.1 commonly used olc a***embly software copy this link to clipboard
Text Styling icon
  • STRONG11
  • B196
  • EM0
  • I230
  • U0
  • CITE0
STRONG
No Text
1 Muscle and skin:
2 Tissues high in fat:
3 Enzymatic
4 Metal ion
5 Heat
6 Sonication
7 Barcodes:
8 Indices:
9 Velvet/Oases:
10 Trans-ABySS:
B
No Text
1 qualitative
2 quant**ative
3 Qualitative
4 Quant**ative
5 Sampling variance:
6 Technical variance:
7 Biological variance:
8 counts
9 variances
10 Unless you are genuinely interested in comparing technical aspects of RNA-seq, or you expect technical variation to be especially great for a large majority of the target transcripts, we recommend greater resource allocation to biological replication.
I
No Text
1 i.e. (6)
2 DGE experiments must be designed to accurately measure both the counts of each transcript and the variances that are a***ociated with those numbers.
3 Unless you are genuinely interested in comparing technical aspects of RNA-seq, or you expect technical variation to be especially great for a large majority of the target transcripts, we recommend greater resource allocation to biological replication.
4 differential expression studies using RNA-seq data need to be replicated in order to estimate within- and among-group variation
5 e.g. (13)
6 In practice many protocols actually combine both procedures. In this case, after adding appropriate amounts of alcohol to the aqueous phase from the phenol/chloroform extraction, it is further purified using a silica column.
7 However, this method alone will not accurately catch guanidinium and phenol contamination.
8 However, users that are working with non-model organisms should consult the manufacturer to verify that the capture oligos are compatible with the rRNA in their sample.
9 However, the manufacturer does not recommend this kit for RNA-seq.
10 E. coli (4)
WEBSITE SERVER INFORMATION icon
  • Service Provider (ISP)
  • University of Oregon
  • Hosted IP Address
  • 184.171.105.148
  • Hosted Country
  • imgUnited States
  • Host Region
  • Oregon , Eugene
  • Latitude and Longitude
  • 44.0463 : -123.079

SHARE THIS ANALYSIS